My Bag of Squid

.. to kick down the beach. So stand back.

Wednesday, November 30, 2005

600 pounds of Plutonium could be missing from lab

LOS ALAMOS / Plutonium could be missing from lab / 600-plus pounds unaccounted for, activist group says:
Enough plutonium to make dozens of nuclear bombs hasn't been accounted for at the UC-run Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico and may be missing, an activist group says in a new report.
Hmm. So it wasn't YellowCake from Nigeria after all.
There is no evidence that the weapons-grade plutonium has been stolen or diverted for illegal purposes, the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research said. However, the amount of unaccounted-for plutonium -- more than 600 pounds, and possibly several times that -- is so great that it raises 'a vast security issue,' the group said in a report to be made public today.
Yeah, there's no evidence it's been used for nefarious purposes, but, then again, there was no evidence that Saddam Hussein was aiding Al-Qaeda either, nor that Iraq had real WMDs, now was there? I'm assuming the US will now attack the country where this lab lost all the supplies, and bring that fascist dictatorship to its knees. InvadingSaving the world, one dictatorship at a time!

Oh, wait a minute.

Wednesday, November 23, 2005

Intelligent design taught ... as mythology

Intelligent design taught ... as mythology - Science - MSNBC.com:
LAWRENCE, Kan. - Creationism and intelligent design are going to be studied at the University of Kansas, but not in the way advocated by opponents of the theory of evolution.

A course being offered next semester by the university religious studies department is titled "Special Topics in Religion: Intelligent Design, Creationism and other Religious Mythologies."

"The KU faculty has had enough,"” said Paul Mirecki, department chairman. "Creationism is mythology. Intelligent design is mythology. It'’s not science. They try to make it sound like science. It clearly is not."

Earlier this month, the state Board of Education adopted new science teaching standards that treat evolution as a flawed theory, defying the view of science groups.

Although local school boards still decide how science is taught in the classrooms, the vote was seen as a major victory for proponents of intelligent design, which says that the universe is so complex that it must have been designed by a higher power.

Critics say intelligent design is merely creationism "— a literal reading of the Bible'’s story of creation as the handiwork of God "— camouflaged in scientific language as a way to get around court rulings that creationism injects religion into public schools.

John Calvert, an attorney and managing director of the Intelligent Design Network in Johnson County, said Mirecki will go down in history as a laughingstock.

"“To equate intelligent design to mythology is really an absurdity, and it'’s just another example of labeling anybody who proposes (intelligent design) to be simply a religious nut,"” Calvert said. "“That'’s the reason for this little charade."”

No, no, he really said that. It's obvious his definition of 'laughingstock' is also a bit different from ours. And maybe his rules for Charades...

Mirecki said his course, limited to 120 students, would explore intelligent design as a modern American mythology. Several faculty members have volunteered to be guest lecturers, he said.

University Chancellor Robert Hemenway said Monday said he didn'’t know all the details about the new course.

"“If it'’s a course that'’s being offered in a serious and intellectually honest way, those are the kind of courses a university frequently offers,"” he said.

I'd like the Intelligent Design people to point out any one point in history where Religion actually co-existed with higher learning. I've read about how Copernicus had to delay the release of his Heliocentric theory for decades so that he could release it on his deathbed and beyond the corporal punishment of the Church. I've read similar stories about almost every single scientific discovery ever made, and I wonder just where these creative people actually get off suggesting that their theories are anything more significant than pulp mythology.

And yeah, I have to clean up this post one day. The amount of SPANs and similar crap in the source article makes this one a real mess!

Tuesday, November 15, 2005

Womb needed for proper brain development | Science Blog

Womb needed for proper brain development | Science Blog:
The brains of babies born very prematurely do not develop as well as those who are carried to full-term, according to new research presented today at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience in Washington, D.C.

Well, I'm a freak, then. With a life that began 2 months early, I guess I should be lucky for my lowly 165 IQ as it is. No telling what my potential could have been had I matured completely!

Why are they ignoring the Cult angle?

CNN.com - Teen murder suspect caught in Indiana - Nov 14, 2005:
(CNN) -- An 18-year-old Pennsylvania man suspected of killing the parents of his 14-year-old girlfriend was captured with her Monday in Indiana after leading state troopers on a high-speed chase and crashing into a tree.
Why are they ignoring the important key facts in this case? News media is so very quick to point out less relevant points, but I think the important thing here is:
  • they were home-schooled
  • they were both cult members
Of course, the only thing that's significant about the home-schooling thing is that the victims will take on whatever neive viewpoints their teachers/parents currently hold. The potential social weakness in the minds of these kids was only enhanced by the membership in a very clannish and occasionally vocal cult which had started recruiting near their home.

We must stamp out these nasty cults before more children die.

Is Novell disrespecting SuSE? Wouldn't you?

Is It Deja Deja Novell All Over Again, Again? - MozillaQuest Magazine Op-ED - Page 1 - MozillaQuest Magazine: "The Novell people deny that Novell is dumping either SUSE Linux or the KDE desktop suite."

Apparently some geeks have their tits in a twist because the company which bought the SuSE linux distribution may now be making modifications to the product without consent of the geeks.

How entitled do these outsiders think they are? Do they work at Novell? Do they decide the course of Novell in relation to the market? Do they even have a clue how the market is going? I despise these rags for the very reason that entrenched geeks have their own idea of the sky above their foxhole.

Then again, I have my own bias. I worked for a company which worked with/on the SuSE linux product for a while. I was very surprised that people actually paid money for the product, and figured it had to be a LOT better then the form in which received it. Why, nothing I'd seen before (or since) goes more against the ide abehind Packaged projects under linux, and I've seen nothing I could consider to be a worse kludge than that distro. When they sold to Novell, it only confirmed to me what their secret financial info could not: they were out of money.

Now, I'm sure some people outside of Germany love the SuSE distro, and I will readily acknowledge that I'm being a bit mean toward them. I'm glad they survived as long as they did, but I'm only more pleased that Novell has been able to change things according to its wishes.

Because that's Novell's right. It owns SuSE. Wasn't that clear when it bought the company?

Saturday, November 05, 2005

Bush: 'Your Presidency is Effectively Over'

Capitol Hill Blue: GOP Leaders to Bush: 'Your Presidency is Effectively Over': Doug Thompson writes, in The Rant,

A growing number of Republican leaders, party strategists and political professional now privately tell President George W. Bush that his presidency 'is effectively over' unless he fires embattled White House advisor Karl Rove, apologizes to the American people for misleading the country into war and revamps his administration from top to bottom.

'The only show of unity we have now in the Republican Party is the belief that the President has failed the party, the American people and the presidency,' says a longtime, and angry, GOP strategist.

With the public face of support for Bush eroding daily from even diehard Republicans, the President faces mounting anger from within his party over the path that may well lead to loss of control of Congress in the 2006 midterm elections and the White House in 2008.

"This presidency is in trouble," says a senior White House aide. "Even worse, I don't know if there is a way out of the trouble."

Congressional leaders journeyed to the White House before Bush left on his South American tour this week to tell the President that his legislative agenda on the Hill is dead, his latest Supreme Court nominee faces a tough confirmation fight in the Senate and he is facing open revolt within party ranks.

"The Speaker is having an increasingly difficult time holding his troops in line," says a source within the office of House Speaker Dennis J. Hastert. "Anger at the President grows exponentially with each passing day."

At a recent White House strategy session, internal party pollsters told the President that his approval rating with Americans continues to slide and may be irreversible, citing his failed Iraq war, the failed Supreme Court nomination of Harriet Miers and his failure to deal decisively on a number of fronts, including Hurricane Katrina, the economy and the Valerie Plame scandal.

In meetings, leaders and strategists have suggested a number of things that Bush must do to try and save his presidency and GOP prospects in upcoming elections, including:
  • Apologize to the American people, Congress and our allies for misleading them on the reasons for invading Iraq;
  • Revamp the White House staff from top to bottom;
  • Fire Rove.
"We keep coming back to Rove," says a GOP pollster. "He has escaped indictment, so far, but the feeling within the party is that another shoe is ready to drop and the longer he waits to jettison Rove the greater the damage. As long as Karl Rove remains at the President's side, the Bush presidency is effectively over and he is just riding out the days until the nation elects a Democrat to replace him. Even with Rove gone the damage may be irreparable."

Bush, however, has dug his heels in on Rove. When a GOP strategist suggested last weekend that the President fire Rove, Bush exploded.

"You go to hell," he screamed at the strategist. "You can leave and you can take the rest of these lily-livered motherfuckers with you!" The President then stormed out of the room and refused to meet further with any other party leaders or strategists.

Bush's escalating temper tantrums and his intransigence on political issues increase Republican worries about the long term effects on both his presidency and the party's prospects in upcoming elections.

"Right now, George W. Bush is the Republican Party's chief liability," says a GOP strategist who has advised Presidential campaigns for 30 years. "The entire political future of the party and perhaps the nation now rests on the shoulders of a President that no one - Democrat or Republican - believes in or trusts."
This is without precedent: a president whose party controls the House and Senate, and who enjoys the most power over the most nukes available to one man, would seemingly enjoy global immunity to a lot. This guy wins his hardest election ever, after a term in office punctuated by blunders, evades impeachment, continually, only to have his own party unite in loathing of their own wonder-boy candidate.

Only in America.

Friday, November 04, 2005

Colin Powell's former right-hand man officially becomes Bush Critic

Colonel Finally Saw Whites of Their Eyes: Dana Milbank reports a very impassioned critique of the current Administration.
Colonel Finally Saw Whites of Their Eyes

By Dana Milbank
Thursday, October 20, 2005; A04

As Colin Powell's right-hand man at the State Department, Larry Wilkerson seethed quietly during President Bush's first term. Yesterday, Colonel Wilkerson made up for lost time.

He said the vice president and the secretary of defense created a 'Cheney-Rumsfeld cabal' that hijacked U.S. foreign policy. He said of former defense undersecretary Douglas Feith: 'Seldom in my life have I met a dumber man.' Addressing scholars, journalists and others at the New America Foundation, Wilkerson accused Bush of 'cowboyism' and said he had viewed Condoleezza Rice as 'extremely weak.' Of American diplomacy, he fretted, 'I'm not sure the State Department even exists anymore.'"

And how about Karen Hughes's efforts to boost the country's image abroad? "It's hard to sell [manure]," Wilkerson said, quoting an Egyptian friend.

The man who was chief of staff at the State Department until early this year continued: "If you're unilaterally declaring Kyoto dead, if you're declaring the Geneva Conventions not operative, if you're doing a host of things that the world doesn't agree with you on and you're doing it blatantly and in their face, without grace, then you've got to pay the consequences."

With Bush's approval ratings dropping below 40 percent, the administration's vaunted loyalty and party discipline are suffering. David Frum, a former White House speechwriter, is campaigning against confirmation of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court. Bruce Bartlett, who worked for the president's father, was fired by his think tank this week because he is publishing a book titled "Impostor: How George W. Bush Bankrupted America and Betrayed the Reagan Legacy."

And, on Capitol Hill yesterday, Republicans joined in criticizing the administration about Iraq. When Rice said at a hearing that "we have made significant progress" in Iraq, Sen. Lincoln D. Chafee (R.I.) replied: "Well, we all wish that were true, but we can't kid ourselves, either."

Wilkerson adds a new dimension to the criticism. A 31-year military veteran and former director of the Marine Corps War College, he worked for Powell in the public and private sectors for much of the past 16 years, and he was often described by colleagues as the man who would say what Powell was thinking but was too discreet to say.

Wilkerson's beef with the administration was, for the most part, not ideological. He argues that U.S. forces must remain in Iraq, and he describes George H.W. Bush as "one of the finest presidents we've ever had."

Rather, the colonel objected to the administration's secrecy, which allowed Cheney, Rumsfeld and others to subvert the foreign policy apparatus that has been in place since 1947.

"What I saw was a cabal between the vice president of the United States, Richard Cheney, and the secretary of defense, Donald Rumsfeld," he said. By cutting out the bureaucracy that had to carry out those decisions, "we have courted disaster in Iraq, in North Korea, in Iran, and generally with regard to domestic crises like Katrina." If there is a nuclear terrorist attack or a major pandemic, Wilkerson continued, "you are going to see the ineptitude of this government in a way that'll take you back to the Declaration of Independence."

Wilkerson, part military man and part academic, said "hell" a lot but also used words such as "desultory" and "titular." Peering from large wire-rimmed glasses, armed with a flag lapel pin, he spoke with barely restrained anger. He had given critical quotes about the administration before, but yesterday's New America Foundation speech was his coming out as an administration critic.

He had barbs for lawmakers ("truly abandoned their oversight responsibilities") and said past presidents had also circumvented the national security structure. But, he said, "the case that I saw for four-plus years was a case I have never seen in my studies of aberrations, bastardizations, perturbations, changes to the national security decision-making process."

Wilkerson blamed Bush, "not versed in international relations and not too much interested," for letting the Cheney-Rumsfeld cabal to take over. He blamed Rice for dropping her role as honest broker to "build her intimacy with the president." And he blamed whoever gave Feith "carte blanche to tell the State Department to go screw itself."

The cabal's end run around the bureaucracy, he argued, stalled nuclear diplomacy with North Korea and Iran. He said top officials "condoned" prisoner abuse and left the Army "truly in bad shape."

"You and I and every other citizen like us is paying the consequences," he said, "whether it was a response to Katrina that was less than adequate certainly, or the situation in Iraq which still goes unexplained."

The colonel said his old boss is not pleased with his decision to go public with his criticism. Powell, he said, "is the world's most loyal soldier." Wilkerson said he admired that, but he took a different view of loyalty: not to the administration, but to the country.

© 2005 The Washington Post Company, cached here for easier access.
I dunno, man. Once your military starts criticising things, I fear it may all be over. Who's next to turn away from him? His own party?

Tuesday, November 01, 2005

Joey sent this over. I publicly think it's terribly racist ingrate literature, but secretly we all know I'm also an angry white broke male who's tired of paying for my great grandfather's great grandfather's sin of not finishing a job completely.
My name is Norm, and I am Canadian.

I am a minority in Vancouver, Banff, and every casino in this country.

I was born in 1956, yet I am responsible for some native's great great grandfather who screwed himself out of his land in the 1800's.

I pay import tax on cars made in Ontario.

I am allowed to skydive and smoke, but not allowed to drive without a seat belt.

All the money I make up until mid July must go to paying taxes.

I live and work among people who believe Americans are ignorant. These same people cannot name this country's new territory.

Although I am sometimes forced to live on Kraft dinner and don't have a pot to piss in, I sleep well knowing that I've helped purchase a nice six figure home in Vancouver for some unskilled refugee.

Although they are unpatriotic and constantly try to separate, Quebec still provides my nation's prime ministers.

95% of my nation's international conflicts are over fish.

I'm supposed to call black people African Canadians, although I'm sure none of them have ever been to Africa, or east of Halifax for that matter.

I believe that paying a 200% tax on alcohol is fair. I believe that the same tax on gasoline is also fair.

Even if I have no idea what happened to that old rifle my grandfather gave me when I was 14, I will be considered a criminal if I don't register it.

I often badmouth the United States and then vacation there three times a year.

I believe spending $15 billion to promote the French language in the rest of Canada is fair when the province of Quebec doesn't support or recognize the English language.

I'm led to believe that some lazy ass unionized broom pusher who makes $30 an hour is underpaid and therefore must go on strike, but paying $10 an hour to someone who works 12 hour shifts at forty below on an oil rig is fair.

I believe that paying $30 million for 3 Stripes ("The Voice of Fire") by the National Art Gallery was a good purchase, even though 99% of this country didn't want it or will ever see it.

When I look at my pay stub and realize that I take home a third of what I actually make, I say "Oh well, at least we have better health care than the Americans."

I must bail out farmers when their crops are too wet or too dry because I control the rain.

My national anthem has versions in both official languages and I don't know either of them.

Canada is the highest taxed nation in North America, the biggest military buffer for the United States, and the number one destination for fleeing terrorists.

I am not an angry white male. I am an angry taxpayer who is broke. My name is Norm, and I am Canadian.
Hee hee.

No comments. Piss off.